Difference between revisions of "User talk:Moydow"

232 bytes added ,  19:20, 15 October 2010
no edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:
:# It's always a good idea to have an independent review of an article. On StrategyWiki, the system is to allow a guide's contributors decide its completion level (between levels 1 and 4). Featured guides (level 5) are voted on by the community, and it's often the only point where a guide gets a good thorough review by others. So I'd be favourable to the system you propose. A good idea is to get reviews from increasingly external sources as a page gets closer to featured status. If you'd like, I could help with some of the reviewing, as most of what I do focuses on reviewing edits for quality, and generally keeping pages in order.
:# It's always a good idea to have an independent review of an article. On StrategyWiki, the system is to allow a guide's contributors decide its completion level (between levels 1 and 4). Featured guides (level 5) are voted on by the community, and it's often the only point where a guide gets a good thorough review by others. So I'd be favourable to the system you propose. A good idea is to get reviews from increasingly external sources as a page gets closer to featured status. If you'd like, I could help with some of the reviewing, as most of what I do focuses on reviewing edits for quality, and generally keeping pages in order.
: [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 13:42, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
: [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 13:42, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
::# the idea behind the box is to imitate, but not duplicate, the header seen on wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_Fox_(series) discussion pages]. And thank you, i will continue to try it out.  
::# the idea behind the box is to imitate, but not duplicate, the header seen on wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_Fox_(series) discussion pages]. And thank you, i will continue to try it out.
::# I would strongly appreciate your help in reviewing articles. Do you understand the rules as they stand, and if so, which level do you think you would be best at? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 14:08, 13 September 2010 (PDT).
::# I would strongly appreciate your help in reviewing articles. Do you understand the rules as they stand, and if so, which level do you think you would be best at? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 14:08, 13 September 2010 (PDT).
:::# Never saw those before.
:::# Never saw those before.
:::# The rules make sense to me. According to those, I qualify as a "good-level" reviewer. This said, my knowledge of the Star Fox games is minimal, so I probably should stick to lower levels for now. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 14:27, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
:::# The rules make sense to me. According to those, I qualify as a "good-level" reviewer. This said, my knowledge of the Star Fox games is minimal, so I probably should stick to lower levels for now. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 14:27, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
::::# Ah well, thank you anyway.  
::::# Ah well, thank you anyway.
::::# Would you be interested in being a [[Lylat_Wiki:Decent_Articles#To_Become_a_Decent_Article|decent]]-level reviewer or a [[Lylat_Wiki:Stubs#To_Become_a_Stub_Article|stub]]-level one? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 16:33, 13 September 2010 (PDT).
::::# Would you be interested in being a [[Lylat_Wiki:Decent_Articles#To_Become_a_Decent_Article|decent]]-level reviewer or a [[Lylat_Wiki:Stubs#To_Become_a_Stub_Article|stub]]-level one? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 16:33, 13 September 2010 (PDT).
:I think I'll try decent-level. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 16:41, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
:I think I'll try decent-level. [[User:Moydow|<font color="green">Moy</font>]][[User talk:Moydow|<font color="orange">dow</font>]] 16:41, 13 September 2010 (PDT)
Line 67: Line 67:


:::: Tacopill fixed the template, is it decent now? Foxdude54 14:52 EST, 15 October 2010
:::: Tacopill fixed the template, is it decent now? Foxdude54 14:52 EST, 15 October 2010
:::::@Moydow: when you think it is finished, please replace {{tl|Character-stub-level v2.0}} with {{tl|Character-decent-level v2.0}}.
:::::@Moydow: when you think it is finished, please replace {{tl|Character-stub-level v2.0}} with {{tl|Character-decent-level v2.0}}.  
:::::@Fox dude: I am currently storing all "Stub Level" articles [[:Category:Stub-Level Articles|here]]. Please inform Moydow of any other Articles you think are ready for his review (and myself, if they are currently not protected).
:::::@Fox dude: I am currently storing all "Stub Level" articles [[:Category:Stub-Level Articles|here]]. Please inform Moydow of any other Articles you think are ready for his review (and myself, if they are currently not protected).  
:::::@Myself: Get busy promoting Start-level articles to stub-level for review.
:::::@Myself: Get busy promoting Start-level articles to stub-level for review.  
:::::{{User:Tacopill/sig}} 12:09, 15 October 2010 (PDT).
:::::{{User:Tacopill/sig}} 12:09, 15 October 2010 (PDT).


::::: Sounds like a plan. Foxdude54 14:13 EST, 15 October 2010
::::: Sounds like a plan. Foxdude54 14:13 EST, 15 October 2010
== Peppy/Decency ==
First of all, I think Peppy Hare should be considered for being upgrade, and secondly, we should probably find another place for people to put their suggestion ideas. Foxdude54 14:20 EST, 15 October 2010
237

edits