|
|
| (60 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{HelpNav}}<div align=right style="float:right">__TOC__</div> | | {{shortcuts|LW:QS}} |
| | | {{Standards}} |
| What makes a good article? When it is edited by many editors? When it contains information that is accurate, verifiable and relevant? When it links to and is linked by other atricles?.... | | {{HelpNav}} |
| | | {{Article Level}} |
| How about all of those! Welcome to Lylat Wiki's Guide to producing good articles (stage 4 of {{LW:5StFA}}). On this page, you will find almost every topic on how to make a decent article, and how to make a good article from a decent one. This is not for starting a new article, or for expanding a stub. Those are {{LW:SAA}} and {{LW:Stubs}}.
| | What makes a good article? The '''Quality Standards''' explains the composition of a good article for Lylat Wiki (stage 4 of [[LW:5StFA]]). Various topics are covered here, like how to expand on a [[:Category:Stubs|stub]]. A good article is widely considered to be one of the best articles on the wiki. A decent article is not as comprehensive like a good article, as it still requires fixing before reaching that status. |
| | |
| * A '''good article''' - is considered to be among the best of the wiki, but has not been selected, or at one time was selected, to be a featured article.
| |
| * A '''decent article''' - is considered to be on it's way to being good, but still requires fixing and expanding before being so.
| |
| | |
| The following three pages are major contributors to the topics covered here. We think these wiki's for having there information available.
| |
| * [[SMW:MarioWiki:Maintenance]]
| |
| * [[bp:Category:Notice_templates]]
| |
| * [[wikipedia:Template:Multiple_issues]]
| |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == Language == | | == Language == |
| === inappropriate tone or style ===
| | Most importantly, articles must be written in a clear, encyclopedic tone. Do not add any biased, informal and/or opinionated content into an article. Other words to avoid using includes: |
| Articles should be written in an encyclopedic tone. Any of the following tones should be considered in appropriate unless there is a specific reason why it is that way, and the reason is clearly marked or visible.
| |
| # advertisement
| |
| # biased
| |
| # biography - auto, unreliable citations
| |
| # written like a travel guide
| |
| # like a resume
| |
| # a howto
| |
| # essay
| |
| # reads like a story
| |
| # [[#Written Like A Review]]
| |
| | |
| === word usage ===
| |
| Articles should use the correct words. Which means no or little of:
| |
| # colloquial terms or jargon - including gaming terms, scientific, or slang, without an appropriate link to explain the meaning.
| |
| # containing weasel words - Words that appear to be specific, but aren't.
| |
| # wording promotes subject - is written in such a way that it promotes the subject, rather than inform about it.
| |
| # unencyclopedia
| |
|
| |
|
| === Point of View ===
| | * jargon and other colloquial terms: this includes gaming terms, scientific, or slang terms |
| Articles need to be written in a 3rd Person Point-of-View. They need to be written in a in-universe.
| | * weasel words: these are words that appear to be specific but are not. |
| # first-person or second-person
| | * promoting the subject: this is when the writer makes a template promoting the subject |
| # fiction vs. fact
| |
| # in-universe
| |
| # globalize
| |
| # not neutral
| |
|
| |
|
| === conflict of interest === | | === Point of view === |
| Articles need to be written in such away that doesn't cause it to conflict with itself. It should also not be written by the person it is written on.
| | An article must be written in a third-person perspective, otherwise known as "{{wp|Fictional universe|in-universe}}". Avoid using {{wp|First-person narrative|first-person}} and {{wp|Narration#Second-person|second-person}} narratives. A third-person perspective means that the writing is "neutralized". Articles must only contain information relating to the subject and must not overwhelm the reader with details. |
|
| |
|
| === confusing ===
| | Similarly, certain audiences might have an easier time understanding an article, such as if there are too many technical details. The article must be written in a way to accommodate every reader. |
| Articles should be written in a clear and precise manner.
| |
|
| |
|
| === context ===
| | A "good" article features a decent blend of all three point of views. If an article needs more of a specific type of reference, add the {{t|source-needed}} template and specify which type of source is needed. |
| Articles need to contain only the information related to the title, and nothing outside of the articles context.
| |
|
| |
|
| === contradiction === | | === Cleanup === |
| An article should not say one thing in part, and then say the opposite in another. Should this happen, please put {{tl|contradiction}} on the article, possible in the section where the contradiction is. | | An article may not be well written and poorly sorted. Any article in need of a rewrite should be tagged with {{t|rewrite}} and provided with a reason, if possible. |
|
| |
|
| === example farm === | | === Prose === |
| Unless there is a good reason, an article should not exist to simply be an example of something. This means no:
| | [[wikipedia:prose]] is a type of language that is most often used by people during communication. Unlike poetry, bulleted or numbered lists, and tables, prose requires full sentences integrated into paragraphs. An article should oftentimes prefer the use of prose. For example, the bulleted list can be converted into prose: |
| # Demonstrating of Templates,
| |
| # Filling up Random Categories
| |
| # Using Random Files.
| |
|
| |
|
| If you are trying to do an experiment, please keep it to a subpage of your userpage, or [[Lylat Wiki:Sandbox]]
| | * Fox McCloud is James McCloud's son |
| | * He leads Star Fox |
| | * He is friends with Falco Lombardi |
|
| |
|
| === clean up ===
| | resulting in: |
| Because an article can be written by anyone, and since we are all individuals, Not every article will be up to someone's spelling and/or grammar. If you find an article that needs some linguistic love, please either edit it yourself or mark it with {{tl|SandG}}.
| |
|
| |
|
| === Time ===
| | Fox McCloud is James McCloud's son. He leads Star Fox and is friends with Falco Lombardi. |
| Due to Lylat Wiki being an encyclopedia, and since no one has any clue when an article will be read, it is considered best to write in the past tense, unless there is a very good reason why it should be otherwise. Please be wary of the following:
| |
|
| |
|
| ; {{tl|recentism}}
| | === Tense === |
| : Writing an article to with the preference towards current events, helps understand what's going on write now, but what happens when the event is over? | | *'''Past tense:''' This should be used when describing the history or background of the subject. |
| ; {{tl|proseline}}
| | *'''Present tense:''' This should be used when describing the gameplay. |
| : is the events in i timeline, that are better in a prose-form?
| | *'''Future tense:''' This tense should be avoided. |
| ; {{tl|updated}},
| |
| : an event is going on, or has gone on, in which details of the article are no longer accurate. This is not for current events, where infromation is coming in for rapidly.
| |
| ; {{tl|current events}}
| |
| : Event(s) are happening, that causes an article to repeatedly be out-of-date, and thus, will be changed many times over its course. | |
| | |
| === unbalanced ===
| |
| In the event an article is largely one-sided, and can not easily be fixed by one editor, place {{tl|unbalanced}} on it, and work on fixing it with other on the relevant discussion page.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Verification == | | == Verification == |
| Any information can be put on a wiki, and Just as easily removed. With that kind of inconsistency and questionable reliability, it is best to verify something you put on the wiki with a reputable outside source. Just the same, if you see something on the wiki, you believe would be better said if it could be verified, please mark it so, or find a way to verify it yourself and post the link on the article. See {{LW:CP}} and [[Help:Citing Sources]] for more info.
| | Verification is needed, as any person can arbitrarily add unreliable information. The reader of an article expects to be provided accurate information on the subject. If a fact has debatable reliability, it must be marked with a reputable external source. In most cases, a reputable source is an official website relating to ''Star Fox''. For more info, see [[Help:Citing Sources]]. Here are some rules involving citations: |
|
| |
|
| The following are possible situations related to citing sources, and how to handle them. | | *If a statement needs to be verified, add {{t|citation needed}} after the sentence. |
| | *Do not use opinionated links or criticism for citation. A critical review of a subject is allowed on a personal user page or community page. |
| | *The wiki cannot predict the future, so speculation is not allowed. If there is any future or upcoming event (such as a new ''Star Fox'' game), sources must be added. |
| | *An "External links" section is different from the "References" section, as it directly links to the subject's page on another site, such as Wikipedia, IMDb, or GameFAQs. |
| | *Try using a variety of reputable sources for an article, so that the information does not heavily reflect that from one link. |
|
| |
|
| === Missing citations === | | === Original research === |
| In the event an article has little to no citations, please put {{tl|Missing Citations}} at the top of the article, and {{tl|Citation Needed}} near any statement that you believe needs citing. This should be done, even if the entire article is to your knowledge of the truth, since it may not be to someone else's.
| | Original research is one of the biggest problems involving article content. This is content, usually theories, that look reputable but were made up from the reader itself. Sometimes it may even be based on an official publication. Original research is similar but less distinguishable from blatant [[LW:FANON|fanon]]. |
|
| |
|
| === wrong citation style ===
| | Articles should not be written to conflict with itself. An article is written by the subject themselves (usually a [[Nintendo]] staff member) is known as a '''conflict of interest'''. |
| If one or more references in a #References section are of the wrong style (e.g. references an archived website, but instead is styled for a print article, or is even not styled at all), please place {{tl|Wrong Citation Style}} along with the ref #'s, if available.
| |
|
| |
|
| === citations may not verify text === | | == Style and Content guide == |
| In the event a piece of text has a reference <sup>[number]</sup>, but the supplemental information doesn't really verify the statement, please place {{tl|cmnvt}} at the top of the article, and give more details as to why you believe this to be so on the article's respective talk page.
| | A good article contains information that is easily accessible to the reader, as well as sections that accurately reflect the content. Each reader has their own way of reading an article, so an article must attempt a variety of methods at displaying information to the reader. For example, if the information is stored on an image, it can be described in text form for non-visual readers. |
|
| |
|
| === criticism === | | Most articles must be divided by section, with the use of using <nowiki>===</nowiki> header tags. The section title must accurately describe what it is about. For example, if a section is intended to be about a character's appearance, the section can be appropriately named "Appearance". |
| If an article presents the opinion of a critic, copies or features a criticism of the subject, then it must not be written to be a critic of the criticism, nor a critic of the subject matter itself. Presenting the criticism helps develop a fuller understanding of a topic, but it should not change the tone or point of view of the article. If you find a section that does so, please tag it with {{tl|criticism-section}}
| |
|
| |
|
| If you wish to provide a critical review of a subject, please do so at your user page or at a community page, which ever is more appropriate.
| | === Introduction === |
| | An introduction is the first paragraph on the article. It is generally used for summarizing the subject, which is described more in depth from its sections. |
|
| |
|
| === speculations ===
| | If there is an issue with the introduction, it can be marked with one of these templates: |
| Our wiki can't predict the future. No should it be edited to make it seem like it does. Specuilating - i.e. predicting future events inside or outside the star fox universe, about the star fox franchise, etc. - without providing sources to prove that it is likely to happen, is not a good idea to have on the wiki. It violates the trust visitor's have in the wiki and forces us to remove information we may otherwise want.
| |
|
| |
|
| In short:
| | # {{t|intro-too-short}} |
| * Please do not use the wiki to try and predict the future - please use {{tl|upcoming-event}} & {{tl|future-events}} on something that contains information about an upcoming event.
| | # {{t|intro-too-long}} |
| * Please do no edit the wiki to forecast future events - {{tl|future-edited}}
| | # {{t|intro-missing}} |
| * Please only put information about planned future events (in universe or outside) when you have evidence to back it up - use {{tl|speculation}} to mark an artilce with unverified perdicitions, and use {{tl|future-events}} and {{tl|upcoming-event}} to mark articles with perdicited events that can be verified.
| | # {{t|intro-rewrite}} |
|
| |
|
| | === History === |
| | In order to better understand a subject, it is sometimes useful to know their in-universe and real world history. For example: |
|
| |
|
| Note:
| | *'''Real world''': What inspired the creation of a character? |
| * {{tl|future-events}} is to be used for marking articles with in-universe perdicted events. | | *'''In-universe''': How did a character get to where they are? How was their aircraft designed? |
| * {{tl|upcoming-event}} is to be used for marking articles with out-of-universe perdicted events.
| |
|
| |
|
| === accuracy disputed ===
| | Sometimes, a reader may only look up one thing in the in-universe history. However, they may accidentally read too much without being warned of spoilers. In such cases, the {{t|spoiler}} template must be applied to warn readers. |
| Think an article contains unlikely statements? Think it says something that needs needs more references, even if there are some already there? Calling the accuracy into question, for these or any other reason, happens when you place {{tl|Accuracy Disputed}} on top of the article.
| |
|
| |
|
| === needs expert === | | === Quotes === |
| Feel a page needs more verification? in doubt of an article's related scientific or game-play knowldge? Think we should bring an expert in on the subject? Then place {{tl|Expert Needed}} on the article, and maybe a expert will get to it... if they aren't to busy be an expert :P.
| | A character article can contain quotes from that character. If too many quotes are listed on a page, the entire list should be moved to a subpage. |
| === hoax ===
| |
| When a visitor comes to our wiki, they are expecting us to be honest about the subject matter. Providing truthful information backed by reliable sources help us keep that trust. However, providing false information, truthful information with fictionalized sources, or anything similar compromise the integrity of the wiki.
| |
|
| |
|
| * If you see a page providing false information among true infomation, please tag it with {{tl|info-maybe-false}} near the false information, and {{tl|article-contains-false-info}} at the top.
| | === Trivia === |
| * If you see a page providing nothing but false information, please place {{tl|hoax}} at the top of the page.
| | A trivia section belongs at the end of an article, and it contains bulleted lists of miscellaneous information. Before adding to trivia, editors should attempt to see if the information is better suited under another section. |
| * If any references you check out prove to be fictionalized (e.g. doesn't exist, from a april fool's website, etc.) please place {{tl|references-fictionalized}}. Please do no put {{tl|fictional-refernce}} as this may be a first party reference. For more, please see [[#Types of References]].
| |
|
| |
|
| === written like a review === | | == Linking == |
| As tempting as it may be, please do not write an article to be a review of the subject matter. The wiki needs to present information as is, including all information without judgement. Sourcing outside reviews, from reputable authors and/or editors, helps develop an understanding of the subject matter, but the section or article should not be a review itself. If an article is written in such a way, please mark it with {{tl|like a review}} at the top of the page or section.
| | Wikis have the ability to {{wp|hot-link}} to other articles and even external links. There are a few rules to linking on an article: |
|
| |
|
| === original research ===
| | * Do not link to another article multiple times. This should only be done a few times, once per every few sections. |
| This is one of the biggest problems a wiki faces, mostly due to the nature of anyone being able to edit. There will be times where a use has put in something not that they found in an official publication, but something they came up with themselves. Unlike a piece of fanon, or fanfiction, this information looks highly reputable, as if it did come from a official publication. Please tag {{tl|Original Reserch}} if you see anything. | | * Do not link to words that are irrelevant to ''Star Fox'', for example: "apple", "of", "grapes" |
| | * External links should be used in accordance to [[LW:IWP|the interwiki policy]]. |
|
| |
|
| please understand that fanon is a fan-held theroy that doesn't necessarily regard official publications. Original research does honor official publications, but tries to build upon them with original ideas that weren't found in those publications, and therefore can't be verified, only partially proven.
| | An article without any links is known as a "dead-end"; a list of them can be found under [[Special:DeadendPages]]. Adding links to an article keeps it out of the list of dead-end pages. |
|
| |
|
| Although they overlap, fanon and original reserch has some key differences:
| | At times, articles may link to a disambiguation page, which are intended to help users differentiate between two articles of the same title. For example, [[Star Fox (team)]] and ''[[Star Fox (game)]]'' are listed under [[Star Fox]]. Based on the context, the link must be changed to which "Star Fox" exactly described by the article. |
| <div align=center>
| |
| {| class="color9 wikitable" border=1 width=40%
| |
| |-
| |
| ! fanon
| |
| ! original reserch
| |
| |-
| |
| | backed by third-party sources, but little second or first.
| |
| | little to no references of any type.
| |
| |-
| |
| | does not have to care about what official publications say.
| |
| | cares about official publications, and tries to build upon them
| |
| |-
| |
| | can be considered reputable to the untrained eye.
| |
| | perceived to be reputable, even to a trained eye, as if it was by a reliable source, if any existed.
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
|
| === needs more references === | | == Other == |
| An article has at least three references? good. Does it need more? if so, attach {{tl|needs-more-resources}} at the top of the article and encourage others to add them.
| | === Incomplete === |
| | To become a good article, the editor must avoid leaving out as much information as possible, especially large portions of information. An example of missing information is if a walkthrough leaves out a stage, a gallery is missing screenshots, etc. The {{t|incomplete}} template should be added in such cases, with a reason provided in the template. |
|
| |
|
| If it has 3 of less citations, then please place {{tl|Missing Citations}} on top instead.
| | === Multiple issues === |
| | | If an article has numerous issues, the {{t|multiple issues}} template should be added on it. This is because adding each template describing an individual issue would occupy too much content space. |
| == Policy ==
| |
| | |
| === external links conflict guidelines === | |
| External links that are part of an Article, or in a #External Links section, need to be related to the subject of the article. In the event that they don't, please mark it with {{tl|elcg}} if you feel this is so, but wish to see if others agree.
| |
| | |
| === Fanon ===
| |
| Fanon is a fan-made theory to cover a gap in the plot, missing detail in game design/development, or something similar, but lacks concrete evidence to prove it. We want to be there to support the starfox community(ies), but fanon can detract from quality of the wiki. Please follow {{LW:Fanon}} if you believe you have found a piece of fanon on the wiki. We do not wish to insult anyone, but if a theory is not supported by official evidence, we will need to question it.
| |
| | |
| === over-detailed ===
| |
| === too narrow of audience for details ===
| |
| Is an article written too technical? or too in-depth? will only one-type of audience benefit from it, at the expense of many others? if so, please place one of the following on the article, too bring this to others attention.
| |
| | |
| * {{tl|too-narrow}}
| |
| * {{tl|too-technical}}
| |
| * {{tl|too-scientific}}
| |
| | |
| | |
| === prose ===
| |
| === Types Of References ===
| |
| In order to make sure we show an unbaised point of view, it is often best to resources from at least 3 different sources. Depending on your situation, any or all of the sources needs to comes from one of three locations.
| |
| | |
| # First-party - is something that said or when on in the games themselves.
| |
| # Second Party - is something found on an official publication, website or archive there of.
| |
| # third Party - is a reputable source created by a fan of the series, an expert in a scientific field, a game review site, etc.
| |
| | |
| A "good" article is one that features a decent blend of all three. In the event you believe an article needs more of a specific type of reference, then please more it with one of the following:
| |
| # {{tl|first-party-sources-missing}}
| |
| # {{tl|second-party-sources-missing}}
| |
| # {{tl|third-party-sources-missing}}
| |
| | |
| === relies too much on one source ===
| |
| === unreferenced ===
| |
| | |
| == Style & Content Guide ==
| |
| Articles need to be designed with 2 things in mind: [[wikipedia:accessibility]] and [[wikipedia:findability]]. Everything on the article, and often in other pages too, needs to be easily findable through search engines (google included) and through the browser.
| |
| * To be accessible: Means not to be available to even those with impairments on their hearing or seeing.
| |
| * to be findable: Means it is easy to find the information on a given page.
| |
| | |
| How an article accomplished is as follows:
| |
| # ''sectionalized'': using <nowiki>===</nowiki> header tags, a section is carved out of the page for a specific area of content. The section title needs to be coherent and accurate reflection of the content bellow.
| |
| # ''multiple ways of displaying info'': There are multiple ways people observe, learn, and understand information. This also means, that if information is stored in an image, there needs to be a text base equivalent for those who are hard of seeing, have reduced bandwidth, images disabled, etc.
| |
| | |
| Sections that are often found on
| |
| | |
| === introduction ===
| |
| An introduction needs to be a summary of the article, as well as a paragraph giving general information that is relevant, but does not necessarily fit into any of the lower sections exclusively.
| |
| | |
| An introduction can be marked with the following:
| |
| # {{tl|too short}}
| |
| # {{tl|too long}}
| |
| # {{tl|missing}}
| |
| # {{tl|rewrite}}
| |
| === lacks historical info ===
| |
| In order to get a better understanding of a subject, it is sometimes best to see how they got there. For us, this manifest itself in two ways:
| |
| | |
| # ''{{tl|OOUHI|Out of Universe}}'' - What was the creator thinking when he came up with a character?
| |
| # ''{{tl|IUHI|In-Universe Info}}'' - how did a character get to where they are? how did a ship get designed? how did the item [[bomb]] come into existence?
| |
| | |
| === quotes ===
| |
| Quotes are always fun to throw around, but how do you know when there is enough?
| |
| well, put one of the following down, and discuss it with your fellow editors.
| |
| # {{tl|too many quotes}}
| |
| # {{tl|too little quotes}}
| |
| | |
| === plot ===
| |
| We all like to know generally what happened in a game, but what if you are in the middle of playing you look up how to do something, and by accident, you read to much. When this happens, the plot has been spoiled for you.
| |
| | |
| including the plot is important for an article - we need to know what when on, in order to get a full understanding of the subject.
| |
| | |
| # {{tl|too much info}} - in the event too many details are given, and it detracts from the quality of the article.
| |
| # {{tl|too little info}} - if there is little to know information of the plot, and it is important to the article.
| |
| # {{tl|spoiler}} - a template to hide important plot details you don't want people to know, should they care for something like this.
| |
| === rewrite entirely ===
| |
| If an article is really, really bad, please put {{tl|rewrite entirely}} on it. this will prompt users (hopefully) to rush in, trying to edit the article to make it better.
| |
| | |
| If you have vollunteered to mass rewrite an article, first '''THANK YOU''', from the entire {{LW:Admin}}. You have no idea how much work you are saving us, and we probably we'll never get to properly show you gratification. Second, please post {{tl|mass rewrite}} on top of the article, in order to give notice to other that a mass edit is going on, and in order to prevent edit wars, they may wish to wait on their contributions. But please remove the notice when you are done.
| |
| | |
| === trivia ===
| |
| A trivia section should contain {{*}} bulleted lists of little tidbits of information. These each should still follow our spelling and grammar rules. There is just no need to put it in prose, unless it really does work out better that way.
| |
|
| |
|
| * {{tl|prose}} - to recommend it be prose.
| | == Conclusion == |
| * {{tl|bulleted list}} - to recommend it be a bulleted list
| | In conclusion, a good article stems from a decent article. If it has been too long since the last evaluation, and many changes have been done to the article, it may have to be re-evaluated before its qualification as a good article. |
|
| |
|
| | In short, a good article has: |
| | * proper grammar, verifiable sources, and properly organized sections. |
| | * and is written in accordance to most policy pages, including the aforementioned sections. |
|
| |
|
| === needs reorganized === | | == See also == |
| Think an article needs to be reorganized? is it missing sections that you know should be there? Then mark it with one of the following templates:
| | *[[LW:SAA]] - creating an article |
| # {{tl|sectionalized}}
| | *[[LW:Stubs]] - stubs |
|
| |
|
| | == Credits == |
| | We thank the contributors of the following pages as they were a big inspiration to this page: |
|
| |
|
| | * [[mariowiki:MarioWiki:Maintenance|Super Mario Wiki]] |
| | * [[bulbapedia:Category:Notice templates|Bulbapedia]] |
| | * [[wikipedia:Template:Multiple issues|Wikipedia]] |
| | * [[zeldawiki:Zelda Wiki:Quality Standards|Zelda Wiki]] |
|
| |
|
| === list of non-notable stuff ===
| |
| In the event an article has decrease in quality to the point of not containing anything notable and being no more than a list, please place {{tl|list-of-non-notable-stuff}} on it.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Linking ==
| | [[Category:Article Pages|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
| One of the beautiful things about wikis, are there ability to [[wikipedia:hot-link]] to other articles. But how often should something be hot-linked? and how many links should an article have?
| |
| | |
| * Well, first, if you are linking to a word multiple times in an article, please only do so once per scroll-height - i.e. the amount you can see on a page without scrolling up or down.
| |
| * Second, only link words that are not commonly used. So, no "is", "as", "of", etc.
| |
| * Third, if you wish to link outside of the wiki, please link in accordance with {{LW:IWP}}.
| |
| | |
| === Terminology ===
| |
| In the event you find a page that needs some linking help,
| |
| * A page without links going to out to other pages is known as a dead-end. Please mark it with {{tl|deadend}}.
| |
| * A page without linking going into it is know as a Orphan. Please Mark {{tl|Orphan}} on any page you find that you believe needs more links towards it.
| |
| | |
| === to disambiguation pages ===
| |
| A disambiguation page exists to guide visitors of the wiki to specific articles, that have similar titles to other articles. Disambiguation pages aren't meant to be the receiving end of a link from another page. If you find a page that has one or more links to a disambiguation page, please place {{tl|Links-to-disambig}} on the page or fix the links to the proper page yourself.
| |
| | |
| === wikify ===
| |
| If a page needs some help linking to others, please place {{tl|wikiy}} on it.
| |
| | |
| == Other ==
| |
| These are some other things that can come up about an article. If these questions are raised, an the article survives, then it is a testament to it's quality and the efforts of those who helped make it.
| |
| | |
| === incomplete ===
| |
| An article is missing a rather large piece, or maybe many small ones. this could be Walthough missing a stage, a gallery missing screenshots, whatever. If feel this is so, then please, place {{tl|incomplete}} on the article, and place why it is so on the talk page of the
| |
| | |
| === notability questioned ===
| |
| Should an article be part of the wiki? place {{tl|notability questioned}} and find out....*evil laugh*
| |
| | |
| === Multiple issues ===
| |
| Should it be, that an article has multiple issues within it, that placing all the templates would take up to much content space, please remove all addition maintance templates, and place {{tl|Multiple issues}} on it, and be sure to preserve the dates the article was originally marked for each marking.
| |
| | |
| == Related pages ==
| |
| {{Article Level}}
| |
What makes a good article? The Quality Standards explains the composition of a good article for Lylat Wiki (stage 4 of LW:5StFA). Various topics are covered here, like how to expand on a stub. A good article is widely considered to be one of the best articles on the wiki. A decent article is not as comprehensive like a good article, as it still requires fixing before reaching that status.
Language
Most importantly, articles must be written in a clear, encyclopedic tone. Do not add any biased, informal and/or opinionated content into an article. Other words to avoid using includes:
- jargon and other colloquial terms: this includes gaming terms, scientific, or slang terms
- weasel words: these are words that appear to be specific but are not.
- promoting the subject: this is when the writer makes a template promoting the subject
Point of view
An article must be written in a third-person perspective, otherwise known as "in-universe". Avoid using first-person and second-person narratives. A third-person perspective means that the writing is "neutralized". Articles must only contain information relating to the subject and must not overwhelm the reader with details.
Similarly, certain audiences might have an easier time understanding an article, such as if there are too many technical details. The article must be written in a way to accommodate every reader.
A "good" article features a decent blend of all three point of views. If an article needs more of a specific type of reference, add the {{source-needed}} template and specify which type of source is needed.
Cleanup
An article may not be well written and poorly sorted. Any article in need of a rewrite should be tagged with {{rewrite}} and provided with a reason, if possible.
Prose
wikipedia:prose is a type of language that is most often used by people during communication. Unlike poetry, bulleted or numbered lists, and tables, prose requires full sentences integrated into paragraphs. An article should oftentimes prefer the use of prose. For example, the bulleted list can be converted into prose:
- Fox McCloud is James McCloud's son
- He leads Star Fox
- He is friends with Falco Lombardi
resulting in:
Fox McCloud is James McCloud's son. He leads Star Fox and is friends with Falco Lombardi.
Tense
- Past tense: This should be used when describing the history or background of the subject.
- Present tense: This should be used when describing the gameplay.
- Future tense: This tense should be avoided.
Verification
Verification is needed, as any person can arbitrarily add unreliable information. The reader of an article expects to be provided accurate information on the subject. If a fact has debatable reliability, it must be marked with a reputable external source. In most cases, a reputable source is an official website relating to Star Fox. For more info, see Help:Citing Sources. Here are some rules involving citations:
- If a statement needs to be verified, add {{citation needed}} after the sentence.
- Do not use opinionated links or criticism for citation. A critical review of a subject is allowed on a personal user page or community page.
- The wiki cannot predict the future, so speculation is not allowed. If there is any future or upcoming event (such as a new Star Fox game), sources must be added.
- An "External links" section is different from the "References" section, as it directly links to the subject's page on another site, such as Wikipedia, IMDb, or GameFAQs.
- Try using a variety of reputable sources for an article, so that the information does not heavily reflect that from one link.
Original research
Original research is one of the biggest problems involving article content. This is content, usually theories, that look reputable but were made up from the reader itself. Sometimes it may even be based on an official publication. Original research is similar but less distinguishable from blatant fanon.
Articles should not be written to conflict with itself. An article is written by the subject themselves (usually a Nintendo staff member) is known as a conflict of interest.
Style and Content guide
A good article contains information that is easily accessible to the reader, as well as sections that accurately reflect the content. Each reader has their own way of reading an article, so an article must attempt a variety of methods at displaying information to the reader. For example, if the information is stored on an image, it can be described in text form for non-visual readers.
Most articles must be divided by section, with the use of using === header tags. The section title must accurately describe what it is about. For example, if a section is intended to be about a character's appearance, the section can be appropriately named "Appearance".
Introduction
An introduction is the first paragraph on the article. It is generally used for summarizing the subject, which is described more in depth from its sections.
If there is an issue with the introduction, it can be marked with one of these templates:
- {{intro-too-short}}
- {{intro-too-long}}
- {{intro-missing}}
- {{intro-rewrite}}
History
In order to better understand a subject, it is sometimes useful to know their in-universe and real world history. For example:
- Real world: What inspired the creation of a character?
- In-universe: How did a character get to where they are? How was their aircraft designed?
Sometimes, a reader may only look up one thing in the in-universe history. However, they may accidentally read too much without being warned of spoilers. In such cases, the {{spoiler}} template must be applied to warn readers.
Quotes
A character article can contain quotes from that character. If too many quotes are listed on a page, the entire list should be moved to a subpage.
Trivia
A trivia section belongs at the end of an article, and it contains bulleted lists of miscellaneous information. Before adding to trivia, editors should attempt to see if the information is better suited under another section.
Linking
Wikis have the ability to hot-link to other articles and even external links. There are a few rules to linking on an article:
- Do not link to another article multiple times. This should only be done a few times, once per every few sections.
- Do not link to words that are irrelevant to Star Fox, for example: "apple", "of", "grapes"
- External links should be used in accordance to the interwiki policy.
An article without any links is known as a "dead-end"; a list of them can be found under Special:DeadendPages. Adding links to an article keeps it out of the list of dead-end pages.
At times, articles may link to a disambiguation page, which are intended to help users differentiate between two articles of the same title. For example, Star Fox (team) and Star Fox (game) are listed under Star Fox. Based on the context, the link must be changed to which "Star Fox" exactly described by the article.
Other
Incomplete
To become a good article, the editor must avoid leaving out as much information as possible, especially large portions of information. An example of missing information is if a walkthrough leaves out a stage, a gallery is missing screenshots, etc. The {{incomplete}} template should be added in such cases, with a reason provided in the template.
Multiple issues
If an article has numerous issues, the {{multiple issues}} template should be added on it. This is because adding each template describing an individual issue would occupy too much content space.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a good article stems from a decent article. If it has been too long since the last evaluation, and many changes have been done to the article, it may have to be re-evaluated before its qualification as a good article.
In short, a good article has:
- proper grammar, verifiable sources, and properly organized sections.
- and is written in accordance to most policy pages, including the aforementioned sections.
See also
Credits
We thank the contributors of the following pages as they were a big inspiration to this page:
